Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 07:31

Thank you.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
AI Is Coming for Your Job, Much Faster Than Anyone Thought - Decrypt
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
What’s next?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Padres Designate Jason Heyward For Assignment - MLB Trade Rumors
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Has anyone tried bestiality and been caught?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
AMD CEO Su turns heads with comments at AI event - TheStreet
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Tom Girardi Sentenced to 7 Years in Prison on His 86th Birthday - Vulture
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Tony Awards: Predicting the Winners Using Just Math - The Hollywood Reporter
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Russia can stop this any time.
6 foods you should be eating for stronger bones, according to nutritionists - AOL.com
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.